收藏本站
收藏 | 投稿 | 手機打開
二維碼
手機客戶端打開本文

On the Historiographical Reform of General History of Chinese Science and Technologyin the Post-Needham Era

Liu Shengli  
【摘要】:The research of General History of Chinese Science and Technology(GHCST) has so far failed to transcend the"positivist history", a program of historiography initiated by Joseph Needham. The historians after Needham have made important explorations on the historiographical reform of GHCST. However, nearly all of these explorations are still the methodological reflections of the positivist history perspective, failing to reflect metaphysically on such historiographical presuppositions as views of science, technology and history, which means they have failed to break away from the positivist history perspective. To go beyond the limitations of positivist history calls for the introduction of the perspective of phenomenology of body and reflecting on and criticizing the historiographical presuppositions of positivist history on a metaphysical level. Such reflection will lead us to a new program of historiography in the post-Needham era, that is"phenomenal history"or the GHCST from the perspective of the phenomenology of body.
下載App查看全文

(如何獲取全文? 歡迎:購買知網充值卡、在線充值、在線咨詢)

CAJViewer閱讀器支持CAJ、PDF文件格式,AdobeReader僅支持PDF格式


知網文化
【相似文獻】
中國期刊全文數據庫 前1條
1 Mu-ming Poo;;Scientific leap-forward in the critical period:the thirteenth Five-Year Plan of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS)[J];National Science Review;2016年04期
 快捷付款方式  訂購知網充值卡  訂購熱線  幫助中心
  • 400-819-9993
  • 010-62982499
  • 010-62783978


亚洲桃色AV无码,男女无遮挡羞羞视频免费网站,少妇下面被精子填满视频,男女裸交真人全过程免费观看